Yes sir, they were married in a legal ceremony in an office. That sounds like a great start to a long lasting marriage. Why waist money on an expensive wedding?
Despite canceling their nuptials scheduled to occur earlier this week, the on-again, off-again wedding of Usher and his pregnant fiancee was finally on — and held quietly Friday, sources told Stella’s Column late Friday night.
The multiplatinum singer married his longtime girlfriend, Tameka Foster, who is several years older than he, during a private ceremony in his lawyer’s office in Atlanta on Friday, sources said.
Among those present was Usher’s mother, Jonetta Patton, who, it has been widely reported, staunchly disapproved of the marriage.
Similar Posts:
- Is Tameka Foster Raymond Planting Stories??? Usher Separation Confirmed
- Monica Already Married, Keyshia Cole To Marry Next Month
- Yes…Usher Wedding Cancelled


Despite canceling their nuptials scheduled to occur earlier this week, the on-again, off-again wedding of Usher and his pregnant fiancee was finally on — and held quietly Friday, sources told Stella’s Column late Friday night.
Digg
StumbleUpon
del.icio.us
Facebook
Twitter
Google Bookmarks
Global Grind
Google Buzz




Manchild
Comment made on 08/05/2007 @ 17:33
Likes It or Hated It:
0
0
Hello Mrs. Grapevine,
May God begin to bless their marriage and solidify their relationship. I hope all the people who claim to love God will begin to pray for the success of the “ministry” that Mr. & Mrs. Usher Raymond have initiated through their marriage.
I pray Divorce never darkens their hearts so the child in Tameka’s womb will experience what happens when mommies and daddies share a love that’s worth giving and receiving.
Manchild
[Reply to this comment]
MG
Comment made on 08/06/2007 @ 04:10
Likes It or Hated It:
0
0
I pray that God has his will, and whatever it is that it be revealed to them. I don’t know what the purpose of this union is, only God knows that. I don’t even know if God brought them together, if so I pray it last. If not, bless the child.
[Reply to this comment]